Whats your views on this?
This time they sent mail via Advocate
Any Advocate here can help us with this
Even after RBI Notice https://rbi.org.in//Scripts/BS_PressReleaseDisp... that Talkcharge should refund us money, but instead of refunding, they are still asking money and threating us
For money extortion, First talkchorge used RBI false notice & now even mentioned Supreme Court of India in fake notice. Scam at its peak. No mainstream news is even convering this fraud. Lol.
I found advocate profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/deepak-prakash-8...38
We all know they are big frauds, but what should our next steps be?
Individually, we cannot do anything but unitedly, we can make him go to jail. We just need support of each other when we need
Many people here or in our circles know big people We should report this and make everyone talk about it
Even some Advocates can fight for us
Our goal is not just get money but also put him behind bars so that we can set example
I am not encouraging users to exploit talkcharge but let me enlighten them about few legal aspects within my limited knowledge.
1) to pursue any legal action of criminal remedy, the onus is upon the prosecution or the complainant to prove their case so the million dollar question is how they can prove their contention that the user used it for commercial not at all for personal purpose unless and until the exploitation was done by that user in large scale.
2) Even for suppose, 10% of the users exploited in large scale, the complainant will focus mostly on those 10% only so rest of the 90% users will be safe as the complainant doesn't desire to waste much resources towards legal expenses just for paltry recoveries.
3) Regarding that huge exploiters too, as the cash back given is not in single one instance and it's done in multiple instances over a period of time, so one critical cross question the complainant has to answer to the court is that why such long period they are entertaining this exploitation and only after RBI took some action regarding some other policy aspect they suddenly woke up and falling after the users? so the complainant company themselves are the cause by their sheer negligence because had they been vigilant at the first instance itself the exploitation issue would have ended then and there itself and it certainly not reached to this large scale. Hence, for their own act of long long complacency they can't suddenly woke up now and coerce recovery proceedings against the users.
4) The last but not the least point is, pursuing case against one or two users is easy but more the users, the more complicated and tedious the proceedings will be to the complainant because of the tactics employed by the lawyers of the multi-party-opposition. It will surely leads to the settlement.