LIC IPO - Govt has asked public & private banks to raise per transaction limit for UPI payments to Rs 2 lakh

117°
  • 2025
  • 1
Finance Mentor
abhishek012

LIC IPO – Govt has asked public & private banks to raise per transaction limit for UPI payments to Rs 2 lakh:

A specially created working group found processing of many applications failed if UPI was selected as a mode of payment by retail investors due to per transaction caps imposed by banks.

https://cdn0.desidime.com/attachments/photos/744533/medium/8272224BJC6M6K.jpg?1645128688

The government has asked public and private sector banks to raise per transaction limit for UPI payments to Rs 2 lakh to ensure applications by retail investors for Life Insurance Corporation of India’s (LIC’s) initial public offering (IPO) through UPI are successfully processed.

A working group — overseen by the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM) — created to check technological readiness of back-end systems for IPOs, had found that processing of many applications failed if UPI was selected as a mode of payment by retail investors due to per transaction caps imposed by banks, an official said.

Retail investors can invest up to Rs 2 lakh in an IPO.

The present limit for UPI, too, is Rs 2 lakh, but different banks have different per transaction limits. About Rs 1 lakh can be spent in a day through UPI, but exception is made for IPO and insurance payments, among others.

However, the working group’s analysis of past IPOs found application failures due to “business decline”. The issue was discussed with National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), and found that such failures were occurring due to per transaction caps or limits imposed by individual banks, said the official.

Business decline are transactions declined due to reasons such as exceeding per transaction limit, exceeding permitted count of transactions per day and exceeding amount limit for the day. According to the available data, about 313,995 IPO mandates — the highest among all banks —were created at State Bank of India (SBI) in January 2022, of which 12.51 per cent were business declines. This compares with 1.96 million IPO mandates created at SBI in December 2021, of which 8.26 per cent were attributed to business declines.

This has led to the government asking banks to lift these individual transaction caps at least when the issue opens, so that retail investors applying for LIC IPO do not face such back-end failures. This has been done for IPO-related transactions, but some banks such as SBI have increased the per-transaction limit for all transactions as it’s difficult to monitor individual transactions due to scale of operations. Other banks are also in the process of removing the per-transaction limit, the official said.

Besides UPI, the working group has also checked the existing IPO framework by placing a high number of dummy bids. Testing has been done by placing 50 million dummy bids/day as against a maximum of about four million applications received for other IPOs in about a three-day window. These dummy bids were placed with stock exchanges, and were sent to sponsor banks to check for any failures.

The working group has also checked the capacity of banks, stock exchanges, depositories, registrars and share transfer agents on how shares are allocated.

“A review has been conducted to find any lapses,” the official quoted above said. Several rounds of testing have been done to ensure the system is capable of meeting IPO demand,” he added.

The working group is chaired by a deputy managing director of SBI, and has representation from Indian Banks’ Association. It also includes representation from Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), share transfer agents, registrar and NPCI, among others.

Disclaimer
We are not SEBI/IRDA registered. The information provided herein is for education purposes only. We will not be responsible for any of your profit/loss with this channel's suggestions. Consult your financial advisor before making any decisions.
replyuser
Click here to reply
Reply