@bikidas2060 @guest_999 @malikcool @Gulag-Survivor @androgame @rogerthat @kartikxxx @TridentDG @bhawin
"If You Don't Like India...": Delhi High Court's Tough Talk For Wikipedia
- 1857
- 41
-
- Last Comment
What is going on with wikipedia?
Have certain people hijacked it to write and promote only anti-India agenda?
I have donated a little amount to Wikipedia a few times thinking it is helping a lot of people for free unaware of it's reality.
Co-founder of Dikipedia Larry Sanger ( https://x.com/l...er ) had already issued a warning: "Nobody should trust Wikipedia."
- Sort By
Kudos to Delhi High Court for issuing a strong statement against Wikipedia. Lot's of misinformation are being spread via Wikipedia. They hate it because India is rising.
I have donated to so many organizations.
Donating to Wikipedia was my biggest mistake.
The whole site has been hijacked by "Liberal/communist" propagandists. They use it to further their political narrative and agenda.
Ye Wikipedia, daily donation ka bheekh maangta hai, lekin main diya nahin kabhi aur na doonga 🤣🤣🤣
These Dikipedia fascists beg me for money every day. 🤣🤣🤣 I have never donated a penny and I never will. These clowns are so shameless that they expect us to donate them something after all of this.
They despise India's rise and the reality that Indians are beginning to decolonize their thoughts. They consider their skewed opinions to be the only truth, and they believe that they have the right to rule over people everywhere and dictate them what to do and what not to do. And these cheap tricks are what these woke supremacist clowns do when they see that not happening. 🤡
Dikipedia is supposed to be a community-driven project where people, over time and several ‘edits’, climb up the ladder and acquire the authority to create pages and make edits. They even get the authority to ‘lock pages’ so others, who are not as ‘senior’ as them can not change the details on the page.
But Dikipedia has a domination of biased editors, and thus, several pages on Dikipedia are biased, with the information added catering to the whims and fancies of the editors of a particular ideology. It is now essentially used as a propaganda tool and a means of establishing narratives.
Co-founder of Dikipedia Larry Sanger ( https://x.com/l...er ) had already issued a warning: "Nobody should trust Wikipedia."
Loved the way Delhi High Court slapped & exposed Dikipedia 🤣🤣🤣
"If you don't like India, please don't work in India... We will ask government to block Wikipedia in India."
Delhi High Court issues contempt of court notice to Wikipedia for not complying with the Court's order directing it to disclose info about people who made edits on ANI's Wikipedia page.
Your poll is biased, offering limited options and restricting what users can choose—perhaps it's even anti-democratic.
Wikipedia is open, allowing anyone to contribute and shape the content. There is quote about Java "there are two types of programming languages: the ones people complain about, and the ones nobody uses", openness and participation can help improve the system.
Here comes Dikipedia's vakeel saab (lawyer). 😅
Dikipedia is supposed to be a community-driven project where people, over time and several ‘edits’, climb up the ladder and acquire the authority to create pages and make edits. They even get the authority to ‘lock pages’ so others, who are not as ‘senior’ as them cannot change the details on the page.
But Dikipedia has a domination of biased editors and thus, several pages on Dikipedia are biased, with the information added catering to the whims and fancies of the editors of a particular ideology. It is now essentially used as a propaganda tool and a means of establishing narratives.
Co-founder of Dikipedia Larry Sanger ( https://x.com/l...er ) had already issued a warning: "Nobody should trust Wikipedia."
Bhai kitne saare comments kardiye ek sath 😳😂, calm down
Many threads gets locked out of no reason or just blaming few posts esp. where discussion is being done about country. Is there any moderator who does it so intentionally?
Hope DD is unbiased and this doesn't get locked.
By the way who can lock the thread?
Only admins can lock and delete the thread, but there are so many admins, so it's difficult to identify who is purposefully locking and deleting threads. Some senior dimers are already working to demystify it.
I once replied to a tweet during Israel war last year. Since then my x account was compromised many times and tweet replies and likes were automatic. I shared many photos of Palestinians ( hacked) without my intervention. So i raised delete request and did not use it for 1 month for smooth deletion.
I saw many wiki edits on my name though i corrected 2 or 3.
GOD KNOWS HOW THEY ARE WORKING.
Have you tried changing your password and adding 2fa to your account
Your issue is not ANI, your issue is why media doesn't go against BJP 24x7, why media doesn't stop speaking against a particular community.
If you were the leader of the country, you would want to control the media to show exactly WHAT YOU WANT. That's the definition of a dictator and a nazi.
Ye to donation mang raha.. start me lag koi plan expire kiya hai . Baad me yaad aaya kon sa plan.. maine to liya hi nahi.. bheekh mangne ki bhi seema hoti hai
@ankur2.0 Another political thread what action you are taking
@bikidas2060 @guest_999 @malikcool @Gulag-Survivor @androgame @rogerthat @kartikxxx @TridentDG @bhawin
Kudos to Delhi High Court for issuing a strong statement against Wikipedia. Lot's of misinformation are being spread via Wikipedia. They hate it because India is rising.
They despise India's rise and the reality that Indians are beginning to decolonize their thoughts. They consider their skewed opinions to be the only truth, and they believe that they have the right to rule over people everywhere and dictate them what to do and what not to do. And these cheap tricks are what these woke supremacist clowns do when they see that not happening. 🤡
Dikipedia is supposed to be a community-driven project where people, over time and several ‘edits’, climb up the ladder and acquire the authority to create pages and make edits. They even get the authority to ‘lock pages’ so others, who are not as ‘senior’ as them can not change the details on the page.
But Dikipedia has a domination of biased editors, and thus, several pages on Dikipedia are biased, with the information added catering to the whims and fancies of the editors of a particular ideology. It is now essentially used as a propaganda tool and a means of establishing narratives.
Co-founder of Dikipedia Larry Sanger ( https://x.com/l...er ) had already issued a warning: "Nobody should trust Wikipedia."
Loved the way Delhi High Court slapped & exposed Dikipedia 🤣🤣🤣
"If you don't like India, please don't work in India... We will ask government to block Wikipedia in India."
Delhi High Court issues contempt of court notice to Wikipedia for not complying with the Court's order directing it to disclose info about people who made edits on ANI's Wikipedia page.
Your poll is biased, offering limited options and restricting what users can choose—perhaps it's even anti-democratic.
Wikipedia is open, allowing anyone to contribute and shape the content. There is quote about Java "there are two types of programming languages: the ones people complain about, and the ones nobody uses", openness and participation can help improve the system.