AAP supporters Plz reply with Open mind
- 16480
- 380
-
- Last Comment
I am not pro or against any party but I would like people to choose with a open mind.. all this advertisement campaigns and ‘Andhi Bhakti of a Person/ Party’ has hampered people’s ability to think clearly
I have already voted in the Delhi region, but I would like to ask only a few questions primarily to AAP supporters who have gone wild to post endless posts in this section.. which were primarily Copy-Paste from other AAP supporting forums..
1. Who is the ruling party of the Country for last 10 Years? Is your nation wide/ online campaign targeted any of their ill policies which has made the economy dip to such a pathetic state?
2. Do you really think that only by a single bill, all the economic problems in the country would be solved??
3. I personally never been to Gujraat, but I have lived for too long in Delhi where you formed the Government, in which I voted for you..
My few questions against I vote I gave you in assembly elections :
a) Where was the money for the Electricity bill reduction routed from? The government budget doesn’t have so much money left for unplanned expenditure
in the last quarter??
c) Do you believe our President is a Congress Pawn or Constitutional representative of India ?? His representative LG of Delhi prohibits a bill to be presented in assembly, but yet you wanted to present it with out his consent…??
d) You threatened the Republic Day parade ( the point when you lost your respect completely in my eyes)because you wanted to suspend Police officer, whom you couldn’t suspend yourself?? Somehow, I feel that there was no difference between Azam khan suspending a police officer for loosing his cows because he had the power to do so and you going on a dharna to make similar thing happen??
e) Another joke would be sting operations in delhi to curb corruption…When a sting is done on your party workers you reply was – " Humne unse baat kar li hai aur tape dekh liya hai usme aisa kuch nahi hai "… so the officers on whom you encouraged people to do sting could also answer in the similar way.. or Is it that only you have the right to tag people as Honest or Dishonest ??
4) Coming back to Lok Sabha Elections.. you said no Delhi MLA would be given a ticket in Lok Sabha.. .And guess what you didn’t .. just the same way you didn’t take support from congress for forming the government after swearing on you children’s head??
5) The selection of candidate was to be done democratically ( I read it some where), but one how a reporter who joined the party 3 days ago got ticket from Chndani Chowk??
6)Is the media as far as your party is concerned is of two types : Sold or Krantikari ???
wepbunny wrote:Utsav wrote:wepbunny wrote:Utsav wrote:amitinmumbai wrote:
please do not spread rumours. AAP has recommended dissolution of Delhi assembly and asked for reelections.
tujhe kaise pata ? AK49 na tujhe phone karke bataya kya ?
Bhai Satta ki lalch madam Sonia sa jyada AK49 ko ha.
bhai satta ka lalach kya hota samaj nahi aaya…agar kejriwal cm se pm bannna chahe to wo satta ka lalach agar modi cm se pm banna chahye to wo deshbhakti..are wah bahi…:-} phir to sare 543 sansad satta ke lalchi hue…
LOL…AAPtards lagta ha purana zamana ka ha..Can’t U Understand Jab seats hi nai mila toh kya kadu sa PM Banega AK49….Yeh Delhi ka election nai tha jo Congress-AAP Bhai-Bhai Karke sarkar bana leta.. Dono Chahe Tab bhi ab oposition ma bhi nai baith sakta.
BURNOL DEALS ARE WELCOMED FOR AAPTARDS
bhai aapko to sabhi dimers ki age pata hai…good..modi ko to seat mil gayi thi yani modi satta ka lalchi hua…
Or U Can take this as modi na AK49 ki lalach par pani pher diya. 
Utsav wrote:wepbunny wrote:Utsav wrote:wepbunny wrote:Utsav wrote:amitinmumbai wrote:
please do not spread rumours. AAP has recommended dissolution of Delhi assembly and asked for reelections.
tujhe kaise pata ? AK49 na tujhe phone karke bataya kya ?
Bhai Satta ki lalch madam Sonia sa jyada AK49 ko ha.
bhai satta ka lalach kya hota samaj nahi aaya…agar kejriwal cm se pm bannna chahe to wo satta ka lalach agar modi cm se pm banna chahye to wo deshbhakti..are wah bahi…:-} phir to sare 543 sansad satta ke lalchi hue…
LOL…AAPtards lagta ha purana zamana ka ha..Can’t U Understand Jab seats hi nai mila toh kya kadu sa PM Banega AK49….Yeh Delhi ka election nai tha jo Congress-AAP Bhai-Bhai Karke sarkar bana leta.. Dono Chahe Tab bhi ab oposition ma bhi nai baith sakta.
BURNOL DEALS ARE WELCOMED FOR AAPTARDS
bhai aapko to sabhi dimers ki age pata hai…good..modi ko to seat mil gayi thi yani modi satta ka lalchi hua…
Or U Can take this as modi na AK49 ki lalach par pani pher diya.
aapka matlab ek lalchi ne dusre lalchi ki umido par pani fek diya…to aap man gaye modi ji also lalchi person….:-)
bhai inko koi b akkal nahi de skta 
tabhi to main kehta hu AN Aaptard alwaz remain Aaptard
Itni buri tarah haarne ke baad b roz koi na koi ultaa seedha siyaapa machaye rakhte hai DD p
In ke Leader ki to hawa nikal gai…
Roz Halla karta tha
Bechara result k baad s Maun Varta me chala gaya hai
‘AAP’ change your leader first than try to change the Country !!!
Har jagah s laat padi to ye waapas Delhi aa gaye hai
wepbunny wrote:m0667 wrote:
this is the best example why modi becomes pm….how modi misused social media and media….
apke log he keh rahe hai..
wepbunny wrote:
aapka matlab ek lalchi ne dusre lalchi ki umido par pani fek diya…to aap man gaye modi ji also lalchi person….:-)
bhai teri samajh sa bahar ha yeh baat…tu rehan de…tu arvind ka statistics pe dhyaan de jo kabhi sahi sabit nai hota ha….;-}
Utsav wrote:wepbunny wrote:
aapka matlab ek lalchi ne dusre lalchi ki umido par pani fek diya…to aap man gaye modi ji also lalchi person….:-)
bhai teri samajh sa bahar ha yeh baat…tu rehan de…tu arvind ka statistics pe dhyaan de jo kabhi sahi sabit nai hota ha….;-}
Ha bahi samajdhar to sirf Modi bhakt he reh gaye dharti par…:-D
Answers on ur points bro
alex wrote:sharma_ji wrote:
Some Intresting facts about AAP
1. AAP contested from 434 seats.
2. Won only 4 seats.
3. On 421 seats they lost their security (zamanat jabt).
4. Out of these 421 candidates 390 candidates got less votes than NOTA.
5. Earlier a party named “Durdarshi party” had a record of loosing security at max. places. (i guess some 320 seats). So this is a new record set by them!
Some exceptional facts about AAP –
1. AAP fielded candidates who were social activists, doctors, engineers and common man unlike Bhajpongress who fielded rich and powerful, criminals and rapists.- AAP is a local goonda party and with full of Criminals … Stone attack on BJP office was perfect example. This party also gave tickets to ex- naxals leader and corrupt one who didn’t get ticket from BJP n Congress.
2. AAP made available the check of every penny of funding they were offered unlike Bhajpongress who spent crores of ill gotten black money from ambanis and adanis.—- Check record first…. dont start chamchagiri without any logic, Court is still waiting for AAP answer on Foreign Funding part
3. AAP had to fight against all odds as even media were biased and each and every word uttered was scrutinised to the greatest possible extent. Things like two security gates at churchgate station were broken and AK did not give toll tax during gujarat visit were played endlessely for hours on TV channels. No media even dared to look at the other side of the Modi development of Gujarat.- Same Media made them hero in quick time that was okay for you… every day Paap do some sort of drama n like janta media also fed up with daily nautanky of this party
4. AAP did not had the funds for Helicopters and Aeroplanes to visit each and every corner of the country for propagation of its honest beliefs unlike Mr. Modi.- check again When Kejriwl came bck from Varanasi after election he came in flight never mentioned anywhere by AAP members… cheap so cheap
5. AAP is the only party who did not took foreign funding unlike both Bhajpongress but were the most targeted by Modi bhakts and the media. So much so that wrong facts were circulated via social media.
hahahah joke of the century…. dont post anything without proper source…. Foreign funding was major contribution in this party
Utsav wrote:amitinmumbai wrote:
please do not spread rumours. AAP has recommended dissolution of Delhi assembly and asked for reelections.
tujhe kaise pata ? AK49 na tujhe phone karke bataya kya ?
Bhai Satta ki lalch madam Sonia sa jyada AK49 ko ha.
haha bjp waale .
AAP ki website Dekho. AK clearly mentioned that dissolution of assembly is recommended for reelections
and please use decency in language .
Utsav wrote:amitinmumbai wrote:
please do not spread rumours. AAP has recommended dissolution of Delhi assembly and asked for reelections.
tujhe kaise pata ? AK49 na tujhe phone karke bataya kya ?
Bhai Satta ki lalch madam Sonia sa jyada AK49 ko ha.
haha bjp waale .
AAP ki website Dekho. AK clearly mentioned that dissolution of assembly is recommended for reelections
and please use decency in language .
kyu bhai same message 2 bar post karne s jaada like milte hai kya? 
amitinmumbai wrote:Utsav wrote:amitinmumbai wrote:
please do not spread rumours. AAP has recommended dissolution of Delhi assembly and asked for reelections.
tujhe kaise pata ? AK49 na tujhe phone karke bataya kya ?
Bhai Satta ki lalch madam Sonia sa jyada AK49 ko ha.
haha bjp waale .
AAP ki website Dekho. AK clearly mentioned that dissolution of assembly is recommended for reelectionsand please use decency in language .
इसी बीच मीडिया और दिल्ली पुलिस इस बात से आशंकित है कि इस ऐतिहासिक जनमत के विरोध में श्रीमान अरविन्द केजरीवाल जी जंतर मंतर या राजघाट से धरने का एलान न कर दें |
bunnymehra1985 wrote:
Answers on ur points bro
alex wrote:sharma_ji wrote:
Some Intresting facts about AAP
1. AAP contested from 434 seats.
2. Won only 4 seats.
3. On 421 seats they lost their security (zamanat jabt).
4. Out of these 421 candidates 390 candidates got less votes than NOTA.
5. Earlier a party named “Durdarshi party” had a record of loosing security at max. places. (i guess some 320 seats). So this is a new record set by them!
Some exceptional facts about AAP –
1. AAP fielded candidates who were social activists, doctors, engineers and common man unlike Bhajpongress who fielded rich and powerful, criminals and rapists.- AAP is a local goonda party and with full of Criminals … Stone attack on BJP office was perfect example. This party also gave tickets to ex- naxals leader and corrupt one who didn’t get ticket from BJP n Congress.
2. AAP made available the check of every penny of funding they were offered unlike Bhajpongress who spent crores of ill gotten black money from ambanis and adanis.—- Check record first…. dont start chamchagiri without any logic, Court is still waiting for AAP answer on Foreign Funding part
3. AAP had to fight against all odds as even media were biased and each and every word uttered was scrutinised to the greatest possible extent. Things like two security gates at churchgate station were broken and AK did not give toll tax during gujarat visit were played endlessely for hours on TV channels. No media even dared to look at the other side of the Modi development of Gujarat.- Same Media made them hero in quick time that was okay for you… every day Paap do some sort of drama n like janta media also fed up with daily nautanky of this party
4. AAP did not had the funds for Helicopters and Aeroplanes to visit each and every corner of the country for propagation of its honest beliefs unlike Mr. Modi.- check again When Kejriwl came bck from Varanasi after election he came in flight never mentioned anywhere by AAP members… cheap so cheap
5. AAP is the only party who did not took foreign funding unlike both Bhajpongress but were the most targeted by Modi bhakts and the media. So much so that wrong facts were circulated via social media.
hahahah joke of the century…. dont post anything without proper source…. Foreign funding was major contribution in this party
Bhai so you believe from the core of your heart that AAP is a party of criminals and AAP is being funded by foreigners. You talked about proper source/ proof from me but you haven’t yourself given any proof.
I am giving you proof as you have asked for it. If you agree with it please don’t reply to this post. 
Talk about foreign funding. 
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sab...
Also as per ADR.
“Among the major parties, the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), with all of its four MPs facing criminal charges, led, followed the Shiv Sena (15 of 18 MPs) and the Nationalist Congress Party (4 of 5 MPs). Over a third of the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) new MPs face criminal charges and over a fifth face serious criminal charges. For the Congress, the proportion is lower at 18% and 7% respectively.”
abhi4334 wrote:
then on which history base u are supporting Aap?
I dont thnk they had any history ever instead now they are history
And regarding ur history affectd decisions
thats only the reason u are not able to see the clear mandate to new govrnmnt
You all always keep on shouting na “janta ka faisla swikar hai”
then why dont u accept their choice.
it seems irrespective of anythng
Rassi jal gai bal ni gaya
Now also if u wont accept then keep promoting aap for atleast 5 years
Dear , the history I am talking about is history of indian politics (which needs to be changed) and not by you but by people like us.
Yes you are right AAP right now has no history. The history it wanted to make got muddled in the tsunami created by money and media power (you won’t accept that, its ok. )
Yes it is janta’s verdict and we have accepted that but true freedom/swaraj is still very far away but struggle we will continue with or without help from brothers like you. 
wepbunny wrote:
Ha bahi samajdhar to sirf Modi bhakt he reh gaye dharti par…:-D
Very True…tabhi toh inn samjahdar logo na modi ko PM bhi bana diya… isliya bolta hu AAP walo ko bhi thori samajhdari honi chaiya..
amitinmumbai wrote:
haha bjp waale .
AAP ki website Dekho. AK clearly mentioned that dissolution of assembly is recommended for reelections
and please use decency in language .
So Now u will teach me wat is so called decency ?
Nd in context to ur query AAP Walo na toh AK49 PM banage soocha tha…Phir Bhi aaptards na unko PM Nai banaya….aisa Q..?
alex wrote:abhi4334 wrote:
then on which history base u are supporting Aap?
I dont thnk they had any history ever instead now they are history
And regarding ur history affectd decisions
thats only the reason u are not able to see the clear mandate to new govrnmnt
You all always keep on shouting na “janta ka faisla swikar hai”
then why dont u accept their choice.
it seems irrespective of anythng
Rassi jal gai bal ni gaya
Now also if u wont accept then keep promoting aap for atleast 5 years
Dear , the history I am talking about is history of indian politics (which needs to be changed) and not by you but by people like us.
Yes you are right AAP right now has no history. The history it wanted to make got muddled in the tsunami created by money and media power (you won’t accept that, its ok. )
Yes it is janta’s verdict and we have accepted that but true freedom/swaraj is still very far away but struggle we will continue with or without help from brothers like you.
Bhai emotional kar dia yar
एक विशेष सूचना-:
आम आदमी पार्टी लोकसभा के चार सीट जीतने के बाद…
-अपने पार्टी का नाम ‘चार आदमी पार्टी’ रख सकती है।
- और ये गाना गा सकती है …
*’चार बच गए लेकीन ‘’पार्टी ’’ अभी बांकी है’ *
sharma_ji wrote:
एक विशेष सूचना-:
आम आदमी पार्टी लोकसभा के चार सीट जीतने के बाद…
-अपने पार्टी का नाम ‘चार आदमी पार्टी’ रख सकती है।
- और ये गाना गा सकती है …
*’चार बच गए लेकीन ‘’पार्टी ’’ अभी बांकी है’ *
फूल खिल गया लूटना अभी बाकी है। …:-D
bhai aapko to sabhi dimers ki age pata hai…good..modi ko to seat mil gayi thi yani modi bhi satta ka lalchi hua…use pm nahi banna chaiye …;-)