Can’t restrain Ramdev’s ‘free speech’: Delhi HC in allopathy case
- 835
- 5
-
- Last Comment
Delhi high court rejected the request by the doctors’ body to “restrain Baba Ramdev from directly or indirectly publishing offending material”
Court told the Delhi Medical Association: "You people should be spending time on finding cure for the pandemic instead of wasting (the) court’s time.
- Sort By
Even I refuse to submit “sir send us screengrab of the offer” to Amazon,
and instead repeatedly (till request gets complied with) ask Amazon to send me all the T and C points on “my” registered e-mail address, for my permanent records.
And not relying on “sir screengrabs sendiye aap”, which are subject to manipulation and depends on later availability of the information on the open internet/site).
On the topic at hand,
So yeah.. they got the request snowballed on grounds like… suit versus litigation right? That is smart😆😁.
Ab to Anpadh neta, Babao ka jamana h.
![Upto 80% off on Fresh Crax Fritts Cream And Onion and other items [location specific]](https://cdn3.desidime.com/topics/photos/1883177/medium/Screenshot2024-11-23at11.28.02AM.png?1732341494)
![Upto 70% off on Fresh Lay's Potato Chips-Spanish Tomato Tango and other items [location specific]](https://cdn3.desidime.com/topics/photos/1883180/medium/Screenshot2024-11-23at11.30.06AM.png?1732341852)
DMA registered objection against the comments. “Ramdev’s remarks are affecting members of the DMA. He is calling doctors names. He is saying this science (allopathy) is fake. Ramdev is falsely representing Coronil as a cure for Covid with zero per cent death rate. Even the government has asked him not to advertise it. In the meantime, he has sold ₹ 250 crore worth of Coronil.” Developed by Ramdev-promoted Patanjali Ayurved, Coronil claims to boost immunity.
“Tomorrow, I may feel homeopathy is fake. It’s an opinion. How can a suit be filed against it? Even if we assume what he is saying is wrong or misleading, a suit under public interest can’t be filed like this. This has to be a public interest litigation (PIL),” the court said in response